- Education Topics
- Achievement Gap
- Alternative Education
- American Education Awards
- Assessment & Evaluation
- Education during COVID-19
- Education Economics
- Education Environment
- Education in the United States during COVID-19
- Education Issues
- Education Policy
- Education Psychology
- Education Scandals and Controversies
- Education Reform
- Education Theory
- Education Worldwide
- Educational Leadership
- Educational Philosophy
- Educational Research
- Educational Technology
- Federal Education Legislation
- Higher Education Worldwide
- Homeless Education
- Homeschooling in the United States
- Migrant Education
- Neglected/Deliquent Students
- Pedagogy
- Sociology of Education
- Special Needs
- National Directories
- After School Programs
- Alternative Schools
- The Arts
- At-Risk Students
- Camps
- Camp Services
- Colleges & Universities
- Counties
- Driving Schools
- Educational Businesses
- Financial Aid
- Higher Education
- International Programs
- Jewish Community Centers
- K-12 Schools
- Language Studies
- Libraries
- Organizations
- Preschools
- Professional Development
- Prom Services
- School Assemblies
- School Districts
- School Field Trips
- School Health
- School Supplies
- School Travel
- School Vendors
- Schools Worldwide
- Special Education
- Special Needs
- Study Abroad
- Teaching Abroad
- Volunteer Programs
- Youth Sports
- For Schools
- Academic Standards
- Assembly Programs
- Blue Ribbon Schools Program
- Educational Accreditation
- Educational Television Channels
- Education in the United States
- History of Education in the United States
- Reading Education in the U.S.
- School Grades
- School Meal Programs
- School Types
- School Uniforms
- Special Education in the United States
- Systems of Formal Education
- U.S. Education Legislation
- For Teachers
- Academic Dishonesty
- Childcare State Licensing Requirements
- Classroom Management
- Education Subjects
- Educational Practices
- Interdisciplinary Teaching
- Job and Interview Tips
- Lesson Plans | Grades
- Professional Development
- State Curriculum Standards
- Substitute Teaching
- Teacher Salary
- Teacher Training Programs
- Teaching Methods
- Training and Certification
- For Students
- Academic Competitions
- Admissions Testing
- At-Risk Students
- Career Planning
- College Admissions
- Drivers License
- Educational Programs
- Educational Television
- High School Dropouts
- Higher Education
- School Health
- Senior Proms
- Sex Education
- Standardized Testing
- Student Financial Aid
- Student Television Stations
- Summer Learning Loss
Home | Lesson Plans | Ball Bearing Roller Coasters and Teamwork Lab |
Ball Bearing Roller Coasters and Teamwork Lab
Author: Brad Clarke
Lesson Plan:
Ball Bearing Roller Coasters and Teamwork
TEAM NAMES...___________________ __________________
___________________ __________________
OBJECTIVE: To design and "build" the largest (total height) 3 hill roller
coaster possible given 366 cm of tubing track and 3 BBs.
MATERIALS: 366 cm of clear vinyl tubing; 3 BBs; 2 or 3 meter sticks;
masking tape; test tube or small beaker; calculator; graph
paper; stopwatch (computer for graphs if preferred)
COOPERATIVE
GROUPS: Groups of 4 people...1 head engineer, 2 assistant engineers,
1 recording/graphing engineer
PROCEDURE: Divide the kids up randomly into groups of 4 with each group
determining assignments within the group.
Have kids come up with their own idea of what potential and
kinetic energy is on a roller coaster ride, and write it
down noting differences between the two and how one affects
the other on the ride.
Kids should brainstorm 2 different roller coaster configurations
each with 3 hills and 2 troughs and draw these from a side
view of how they would look. Label as A and B. Hypothesize
which will have the greatest potential and kinetic energy
overall and circle the letter.
Construct roller coaster A using the tubing and engineers holding
the tubing, insuring that the 2 troughs touch the ground and
that the beginning "hill" is between 60 and 120 cm off the
ground. Experiment with coaster A changing hill heights and
widths of hill and troughs keeping hills similar to the
configuration in terms of which hill is highest, middle and
lowest. Experiment until the BB coaster can make a complete
run all the way through. Time three runs starting when the
assistant engineer counts "3-2-1-GO" and stopping the timing
when the "coaster" hits the glass at the bottom of the run.
(time to .01 secs) Average the times. Measure the 3 hills
from the ground up to the CENTER of the top of the hill in
the middle of the clear tubing "track" and add all 3
together. Divide the total height of the hills by the
average time of the 3 runs.
Construct roller coaster B and do exactly as you did in coaster
A.
DELAB: 1. Which of your roller coasters had the highest score? What do
you think caused the difference between the two different
coasters' scores. (You might want to use the terms
"potential" and "kinetic energy" in explaining this!)
2. What was the average score between the two coasters?
3. ACCURATELY GRAPH your two roller coaster designs using a
horizontal and vertical scale equal to 1 square = 10 cm..
Label the hill heights on each graph. If using a computer
to graph, make sure that your vertical and horizontal scales
are the same.
EXTENSIONS:
4. Come up with at least 3 different extensions which we
might try with this lab.
SELF-ASSESSMENT:
5. Did we work together well as a team?
6. How could we have improved our "teamwork" in the lab?
7. What was the hardest thing that we encountered in the
lab?
8. If we were to completely redo this lab from the very
beginning, we would change....